
"But Ratan had no philosophy": Tagore refuses a consoling ending
In the ending of Tagore's "The Postmaster," the departing man's philosophy collides with Ratan's unanswerable hope, and a single "But" keeps the story from turning grief into wisdom.
Passage
Rabindranath Tagore, "The Postmaster," in Mashi and Other Stories (1918), section "The Postmaster," near the story's ending. The collection was translated from the original Bengali by various writers; readers can consult the canonical record and the HTML text of the 1918 edition. 1
The new incumbent duly arrived, and the postmaster, having given over charge, prepared to depart. Just before starting he called Ratan, and said: ‘Here is something for you; I hope it will keep you for some little time.’ He brought out from his pocket the whole of his month's salary, retaining only a trifle for his travelling expenses. Then Ratan fell at his feet and cried: ‘Oh, Dada, I pray you, don't give me anything, don't in any way trouble about me,’ and then she ran away out of sight.The postmaster heaved a sigh, took up his carpet bag, put his umbrella over his shoulder, and, accompanied by a man carrying his many-coloured tin trunk, he slowly made for the boat.When he got in and the boat was under way, and the rain-swollen river, like a stream of tears welling up from the earth, swirled and sobbed at her bows, then he felt a sort of pain at heart; the grief-stricken face of a village girl seemed to represent for him the great unspoken pervading grief of Mother Earth herself. At one time he had an impulse to go back, and bring away along with him that lonesome waif, forsaken of the world. But the wind had just filled the sails, the boat had got well into the middle of the turbulent current, and already the village was left behind, and its outlying burning-ground came in sight.So the traveller, borne on the breast of the swift-flowing river, consoled himself with philosophical reflections on the numberless meetings and partings going on in the world—on death, the great parting, from which none returns.But Ratan had no philosophy. She was wandering about the post office in a flood of tears. It may be that she had still a lurking hope in some corner of her heart that her Dada would return, and that is why she could not tear herself away. Alas for the foolish human heart!
Gloss
- Dada: A Bengali term for an elder brother, also used as a respectful form of address. Ratan uses it for the postmaster, making their bond sound familial.
- Incumbent: The person who holds a particular office. Here it means the new postmaster taking over the position.
- Waif: A child left without reliable care or protection. The word makes Ratan's loneliness social, not merely emotional.
Close read
The ending is built on antithesis, and Tagore makes the contrast audible through one small conjunction. The postmaster leaves by water; the river swirls, the wind fills the sails, and the traveller turns his pain into a general thought about the numberless meetings and partings of the world. Then the sentence breaks: “But Ratan had no philosophy.” The word but does not introduce another version of the same wisdom. It cancels the consolation that has just been offered and returns us to one person moving through one abandoned post office. Even the two characters' verbs pull apart: he “consoled himself,” while she remains in “a flood of tears” and clings to the possibility that he will return. The river can carry him toward an idea; it cannot carry her out of the room. Tagore briefly turns her grief into the grand image of “Mother Earth,” then refuses to let that image be the last word. Ratan's hope is smaller, less articulate, and more painful: she cannot tear herself away. The final generalization—“the foolish human heart”—belongs to both of them, but the paragraph has shown that philosophy is easier for the person who gets to leave.
Why it still matters
The scene catches a common mismatch: the person leaving can turn a relationship into a lesson, while the person left must live with the unfinished fact. We still use big explanations—distance, timing, fate—to make departures sound mutual. Tagore's last “But” asks us to notice whose grief gets converted into wisdom, and whose remains waiting.
Reflection
When have you used a general explanation to make a separation bearable—and what did that explanation leave out?
Related content
- Sign in to comment.
More from this channel›
- "What in me is dark": Milton makes an epic begin with a request for help
- "You give but little": Gibran makes generosity a question of motive
- "A big, big ant": Hearn lets a kingdom collapse into an ant's nest
- "Gray to be seen everywhere": Baum makes a world that needs a cyclone
- "The woman": Conan Doyle lets a name arrive late
- "Every day saw a girl married and a wife dead": The Arabian Nights turns violence into a schedule
- "Take up and read": Augustine turns anguish into a command
