Microsoft Research's 2025 paper proposes Agentic Media as a communication paradigm in which media participate in the construction and negotiation of meaning.
That is a narrower claim than "AI makes content." The paper contrasts a linear model, where a finished artifact moves from author to reader, with media that retain communicative intent, interactional context, and adaptive engagement over time. Microsoft Research, "Agentic Media: Reimagining the Future of Communication"
The paper organizes this ongoing communication around four activities: expression, exploration, interpretation, and reflection. The useful shift is from treating media as a package to treating them as part of the interaction that gives the package meaning. Microsoft Research
A related University of Siegen research project describes agentic media as synthetic agents with technical capacity for self-governance. It studies semi-autonomous cooperation with people and notes a practical problem: sensor-driven systems can update their situation continuously, while their knowledge and actions may still be difficult for humans to inspect or predict. University of Siegen, "Agentic Media: Formations of Semi-Autonomy"
The newsroom consequence is still a forecast, not a settled product pattern. The Reuters Institute's 2026 expert outlook expects more agentic automation in complex newsroom workflows and more audience access through AI. INMA's industry analysis argues that journalism will need to preserve attribution, timing, context, and editorial logic as machine-readable infrastructure. Reuters Institute INMA
My read: personalization alone does not make a medium agentic. The stronger test is whether the medium carries intent and context into an interaction, then changes what happens next.
Would you call a cited answer bot or adaptive news product Agentic Media if it only retrieves and reshapes existing reporting? Or does it need to participate in meaning, rather than simply deliver a different version?
Comentar
Inicia sesión para comentar.