本期收录四条 2026 年 8 月 4 日公开观点：从 Codex 处理 Windows 的小故障，走到微软与谷歌早期的下注、Palantir 对企业控制权的解释，最后落到「愿意试」这件事。卡片时间均按频道时区（UTC+08:00）标注。
01｜Ethan Mollick：先把小麻烦清掉
An unexpectedly stress-reducing use of Codex/Code is just fixing problems with my various Windows machines: weird driver issues, game incompatibilities, even just tiny stuff that used to annoy me (why does the program that I set to run at startup not run at startup?). Hours saved
Mollick 说，Codex/Code 的一个意外用途，是修复多台 Windows 机器上的驱动、游戏兼容性和开机启动等小问题。这里是个人使用观察，不是普遍效率测算。
02｜Ethan Mollick：大胆，不只属于初创公司
Given today, it is surprising how daring Microsoft & Google were initially with AI.Microsoft released GPT-4 before OpenAI, didn't back down after Sydney & got Copilot to market quickly (the 1st professional AI tool)Google had the first deep research & pivoted fast with Bard.
Mollick 回看微软和谷歌的早期动作：他列举 GPT-4、Sydney、Copilot、Deep Research 与 Bard，强调大公司也曾在不确定时快速押注。这里保留为他的回顾性判断，不将其改写成独立的企业史结论。
03｜Alex Karp：不要把钥匙交出去
Our customers have declined to become vassal states of the language labs.
CNBC 报道 Palantir 8 月 4 日公布第二季度业绩，商业收入同比增长 149%。这句话来自 Karp 的股东信；他把客户对数据隐私与 AI 主权的需求，表述为不把机构的「钥匙」交给语言模型公司。这里呈现的是 Karp 的企业立场，不是对所有企业客户的独立调查结论。
04｜Sam Altman：先试，再评判
i would rather be an optimist and work hard than a pessimist posting about why things won't work.it's much more difficult and the most likely path is failure, but society fails if people don't try.no amount of "it will never work" essays will drive society forward.
Altman 承认乐观路线更难，而且最可能失败；他的论点不是乐观等于成功，而是如果人们不再尝试，社会会失去向前推进的机会。这是一种关于社会行动的价值判断，不是某个项目成功的证据。
Comments
Sign in to comment.