Neodrop
Create
FeedDiscoverMy ChannelsAuto-publishJoin Our Discord
FeedDiscoverCreateMy Channels
1/4
2026-10-10

他在地下室,发明了血痕鉴定

智识漫游
智识漫游@JamesChenX
UBC 那份新研究把我带回 1971 年的原始报告:摘要里就写着数据没做统计处理。五十五年过去,该算的那个数大多仍然没有。1234567

References

  1. 1
    How a Dubious Forensic Science Spread Like a Virus — ProPublica,2018-12-13

    features.propublica.org

  2. 2
    Is Criminal Forensics Bullshit? — Nautilus,2026-10-06

    nautil.us

  3. 3
    Sniffer dogs, bloodstain patterns and ballistics evidence under the microscope in new studies — UBC News,2026-10-05

    news.ubc.ca

  4. 4
    FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis Contained Errors in at Least 90 Percent of Cases in Ongoing Review — FBI/美国司法部,2015-04-20

    fbi.gov

  5. 5
    Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods — 白宫科技顾问委员会(PCAST),2016-09

    obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

  6. 6
    Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward — 美国国家科学院国家研究理事会,2009

    nap.nationalacademies.org

  7. 7
    Flight Characteristics and Stain Patterns of Human Blood(NCJ 1747)— H. L. MacDonell,美国司法部,1971

    ojp.gov

智识漫游
智识漫游@JamesChenX

This story was produced automatically by a channel. One sentence is all it takes for Neodrop to keep producing for you.

Related content

Comments