DeFi Week 35: TVL jumps 25.1% as Gnosis sets an L1-to-rollup path
A 25.1% rise in reported DeFi TVL meets a flow-versus-valuation check, GnosisDAO's L1-to-rollup vote, four security incidents, and extreme yields that require liquidity and accounting checks before a position decision.
DeFi's aggregate TVL rose from $74.730B to $93.461B across the latest weekly snapshots, a gain of $18.732B or 25.1%. The increase was concentrated late in the window: the daily series moved from $82.027B on August 20 to $91.802B on August 23. 1
The headline needs a flow-versus-valuation check. Lido, SSV Network, and Binance staked ETH all posted large increases in the protocol feed, yet ETH-linked TVL can rise when the underlying asset is marked higher. Uniswap V4's 732.7% jump is large enough to keep coverage or methodology changes in the live explanation set. The feed supplies the before-and-after values; it leaves the primary causes of the largest moves unresolved. 2
The cutoff is 10:00 UTC-05:00 on August 24, 2026. The August 17 and August 24 total-TVL readings are the nearest daily UTC snapshots around the cutoff, rather than exact hour-level readings. The protocol, chain, hack, and yield feeds were read for the August 17-24 window.
Quick scan
| Question | Verified reading | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Total DeFi TVL | $74.730B to $93.461B; +$18.732B / +25.1% | The aggregate balance rose sharply, with most of the move arriving after August 20. 1 |
| Largest dollar protocol gainer | Lido: +$6.012B | The largest move sits in an ETH-linked staking record, so deposit flow and asset valuation need separate checks. 2 |
| Largest percentage protocol gainer | Uniswap V4: +732.7% | The size of the jump leaves a coverage or methodology change as a live possibility. 2 |
| In-window security records | 4 DeFiLlama rows totaling $10.3981M on the feed's amounts | Term Finance accounts for most of the listed amount; Allbridge adds a confirmed flash-loan-assisted bridge case. 3 |
| Verified governance outcome | GnosisDAO GIP-153 passed with 123,158 for, 115 against, 151 abstaining | The vote gives Gnosis a design mandate for an L1-to-rollup transition; migration execution remains ahead. 4 |
| Largest displayed yield | Aerodrome USDC-PROS: 53,600.92067% APY | The feed labels the entire displayed rate as rewards; liquidity, emissions, and exit conditions need verification. 5 |
The TVL path
The daily series shows a steady climb, followed by a faster four-day expansion. The values below are the exact figures used for the week-over-week calculation; the dates are daily UTC snapshots.
Loading chart…
The daily changes were +2.0037% on August 18, +0.6821% on August 19, +7.6084% on August 20, +2.9015% on August 21, +4.1622% on August 22, +4.4153% on August 23, and +1.8076% on August 24. 1
That timing matters for interpretation. A rising aggregate can reflect new deposits, token appreciation, changes in what a protocol counts, or several of those effects together. The weekly total is therefore a starting point for the screen, rather than a direct measure of fresh risk capital.
Where the balance sits by chain
The current chain endpoint totals $93.651B. Ethereum holds $49.368B, or 52.7150% of that endpoint total. BSC, Solana, Base, and Tron are the next largest balances. The endpoint supplies current levels and no comparable weekly change field, so the table describes current composition rather than weekly chain flows. 6
| Chain | Current TVL | Share of endpoint total |
|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | $49.368B | 52.7150% 6 |
| BSC | $10.980B | 11.7246% 6 |
| Solana | $5.580B | 5.9579% 6 |
| Base | $5.531B | 5.9061% 6 |
| Tron | $5.230B | 5.5843% 6 |
| Bitcoin | $4.123B | 4.4021% 6 |
| Hyperliquid L1 | $1.543B | 1.6480% 6 |
| Arbitrum | $1.441B | 1.5389% 6 |
| Monad | $0.937B | 1.0007% 6 |
Ethereum's 52.7150% share identifies the location of the balance. It does not identify the source of the week's $18.732B increase. A flow attribution requires a comparable historical series at the chain level.
Protocol ranking: the large moves
The ranking screen uses protocols with at least $50M in TVL, excludes CEX records, and compares each current value with a back-calculated prior value. For each row, prior TVL equals current TVL divided by
1 + change_7d / 100. Displayed figures are rounded to the nearest $0.1M or $0.0001B; the dollar moves use the underlying feed values. 2Largest dollar gainers
| Protocol | TVL before | Current TVL | 7-day change | Dollar move | Primary reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lido | $18.0924B | $24.1046B | +33.2306% | +$6.0122B | Unresolved in the TVL feed. ETH-linked valuation is a live factor to check. 2 |
| Uniswap V4 | $0.7549B | $6.2859B | +732.6668% | +$5.5310B | Unresolved; the scale keeps coverage or methodology change in the investigation set. 2 |
| Aave V3 | $14.2377B | $17.3667B | +21.9768% | +$3.1290B | Unresolved in the TVL feed. 2 |
| SSV Network | $9.5943B | $12.7064B | +32.4376% | +$3.1121B | Unresolved in the TVL feed; the record is ETH-linked. 2 |
| Binance staked ETH | $7.0679B | $9.3528B | +32.3274% | +$2.2849B | Unresolved in the TVL feed; the record is ETH-linked. 2 |
The largest gainer rows should therefore be read as reported TVL changes, not as a clean deposit leaderboard. Lido's dollar increase is the largest in the screen, while Uniswap V4's percentage increase is the most exposed to a possible measurement break. No first-party causal announcement was verified for these leading moves during the window.
Largest dollar losers
| Protocol | TVL before | Current TVL | 7-day change | Dollar move | Primary reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steakhouse Financial | $3.1808B | $2.9445B | -7.4286% | -$236.3M | Unresolved in the TVL feed. 2 |
| BlackRock BUIDL | $3.5464B | $3.3939B | -4.2999% | -$152.5M | Unresolved in the TVL feed. 2 |
| Invesco USTB | $0.7814B | $0.6434B | -17.6649% | -$138.0M | Unresolved in the TVL feed. 2 |
| VanEck Treasury Fund | $0.1933B | $0.0578B | -70.0754% | -$135.4M | Unresolved in the TVL feed. 2 |
| Solstice | $0.5058B | $0.4041B | -20.1128% | -$101.7M | Unresolved in the TVL feed. 2 |
The loser screen contains several tokenized Treasury records. A reported TVL decline in those rows can reflect withdrawals, redemptions, asset-price effects, or accounting changes; the protocol endpoint alone leaves those alternatives open.
Security events
DeFiLlama returned four hack records with event dates inside the window. Their feed amounts sum to $10.3981M. The table keeps the feed's classifications and adds verified incident detail where a retrieved report supplied it. 3
| Protocol | Chain | Amount | Attack vector | Current status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TermFinance Vaults | Ethereum | $8.5M on DeFiLlama; approximately 2,843 ETH and 1.68M USDC, or about $6.9M, in the incident report | Governance exploit: an attacker acquired controlling voting power in a thinly distributed governance token, then passed proposals that redirected vault funds. 7 | Term Labs shut down all Term Meta Vaults, revoked DAO governance roles to block new deposits, left withdrawals open, and coordinated remediation with external security teams. Confirmed recovery: unavailable. 7 |
| Maya Protocol | Mayachain | $1.7M | Protocol logic; withdrawal logic flaw; bridge hack classification in the DeFiLlama record | Remediation and recovery status: unavailable. 3 |
| Allbridge | Base | $191,000 on DeFiLlama; approximately $190,000 net loss in the SlowMist account | Flash-loan-assisted bridge exploit: the attacker forged a CCTP-style message, then used an approximately $809,000 Aave flash loan after the Base Router held about $191,000 USDC. Allbridge accepted the forged message without sufficient sender, recipient, minting, or balance-change checks. 8 | Patch and recovery status: unavailable in the retrieved incident account. The source difference is $190,000 in the SlowMist report versus $191,000 in DeFiLlama. 3 |
| Arrakis V1 | Ethereum | $7,100 | Oracle manipulation; spot-price manipulation | Remediation and recovery status: unavailable. 3 |
Term Finance is the largest listed incident by the feed's amount, and its governance failure is a separate risk category from a contract-level flash-loan bug. Allbridge supplies the week's clearest flash-loan-linked attack path. Maya Protocol and Arrakis V1 remain limited to the fields returned by the incident feed.
Governance
GnosisDAO approved GIP-153 during the window. The official Gnosis announcement records 123,158 votes for, 115 against, and 151 abstaining, from 54 voters. Total turnout was 123,425, against a 75,000 GNO quorum. 4
| Proposal | Result | Vote and quorum | Execution impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIP-153: move from a standalone L1 toward a ZK-proven Ethereum Economic Zone rollup | Passed | 123,158 for; 115 against; 151 abstaining; 54 voters; 123,425 total turnout; 75,000 GNO quorum. 4 | Engineering received a design mandate. Gnosis described synchronous composability with Ethereum mainnet and targeted genesis around the turn of the year, subject to technical milestones. The vote itself created the mandate; it did not immediately execute the migration. 4 |
Daily Crypto Briefs attributed a future implementation consequence to the proposal: the existing validator set would eventually be sunset, and approximately 350,000 staked GNO, described as about 27% of circulating supply, could be unlocked in the future. Those effects remain future implementation context rather than an immediate token distribution. 9
GIP-153 is the only in-window governance outcome in this edition with verified result, quorum, and execution-impact details. The vote changes Gnosis's engineering direction; readers still need the later technical milestones and any implementation transaction before treating the transition as an executed migration.
Yield anomalies
The yield feed contains several extreme Base and Hyperliquid L1 readings. APY, base APY, reward APY, the seven-day APY change, and the 30-day mean below are feed fields. A missing field is shown as unavailable. 5
| Pool | Chain | TVL | APY | Base APY | Reward APY | 7-day APY change | 30-day mean | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerodrome Slipstream USDC-PROS | Base | $723,892 | 53,600.92067% | unavailable | 53,600.92067% | +27,438.55431 pts | 71,021.67191% | Entirely reward-labelled in the feed. 5 |
| Aerodrome Slipstream USDC-VELVET | Base | $4,396,209 | 47,060.44941% | 1.56564% | 47,058.88377% | +7,266.08059 pts | 53,266.53214% | 99.9967% reward-labelled in the feed. 5 |
| Aerodrome Slipstream CHECK-SAND | Base | $1,435,099,528 | 21,096.55832% | 21,096.55722% | 0.0011% | unavailable | 2,838.83182% | Almost entirely base-labelled despite unusually large TVL; validate the rate before treating it as an opportunity. 5 |
| Aerodrome Slipstream WETH-CBBTC | Base | $706,751 | 3,074.85346% | unavailable | 3,074.85346% | +1,685.80209 pts | 3,082.67824% | Reward-labelled in the feed, with WETH-CBBTC asset exposure. 5 |
| Growihf USDC vault | Hyperliquid L1 | $9,406,074 | 1,370.48053% | unavailable | unavailable | +1,370.48053% | 179.97336% | The current APY is several times the 30-day mean; the feed does not identify the base/reward split. 5 |
These APYs are investigation triggers, not promised returns. Before sizing a position, verify reward-token liquidity, emission schedules, pool depth, token price exposure, and exit slippage. CHECK-SAND deserves a separate validation pass because its displayed rate is almost entirely base-labelled while its TVL is $1.435B. USDC-PROS, USDC-VELVET, and WETH-CBBTC require the opposite check: the feed attributes nearly all or all of their displayed rates to rewards.
Position screen
The week's data leaves four practical checks for an enter, exit, or hold decision:
- Separate balance from flow. Treat the $25.1% aggregate TVL increase and the Lido, SSV Network, and Binance staked ETH gains as reported balances first. Check token prices, deposit records, and protocol accounting before reading the moves as fresh capital.
- Investigate the measurement break. Uniswap V4's +732.6668% change is the largest percentage move in the screen. Confirm pool coverage and methodology continuity before comparing it with ordinary week-over-week inflows.
- Price governance risk alongside contract risk. Term Finance shows how concentrated voting power can redirect vault assets. Allbridge shows how a forged bridge message and a flash loan can combine. Gnosis's passed proposal changes a future engineering path, while its execution remains ahead.
- Demand an exit path from extreme APY. Reward-labelled rates depend on emissions and liquid reward markets. Base-labelled rates still require checks on the underlying strategy, pool depth, and pricing mechanism. A quoted APY without those checks is an incomplete risk screen.
The week delivered a large rise in reported DeFi TVL, a governance decision that points Gnosis toward an Ethereum Economic Zone rollup, four recorded security incidents, and several rates that need verification before they can support a position. The largest protocol causes and three incident remediation statuses remain unresolved in the available evidence.
References
- 1DeFiLlama historical chain TVL API
api.llama.fi
- 2DeFiLlama protocols API
api.llama.fi
- 3DeFiLlama hacks API
api.llama.fi
- 4
- 5DeFiLlama yield pools API
yields.llama.fi
- 6DeFiLlama chain TVL API
api.llama.fi
- 7Term Finance incident report via Crowdfund Insider
crowdfundinsider.com
- 8
- 9GnosisDAO Ethereum L2 shift report
dailycryptobriefs.com
This story was produced automatically by a channel. One sentence is all it takes for Neodrop to keep producing for you.