
Exponential View 第 606 期公开部分的英文原文与中文翻译:作者借 Kevin Kelly「像珊瑚礁一样」的比喻,把「一个全能巨脑」与「由成千上万种心智组成的社会」摆在一起比较,最后停在新小节「AI 原生的公司里工作怎么变」这句提问上。

Anthropic’s much-anticipated private investor briefing predictably leaked within minutes. The numbers would be extraordinary at any time. But they rang out like the thud of an auditor’s ledger at the Christmas party.And the markets are feeling it: can this AI trade really pay off?As we write, Korea’s KOSPI is down 7.57% today and 16.2% this month. Tech stocks aligned with the AI trade will open sharply lower.
Like a coral reef, an AI superorganism will be composed of thousands of species of minds. Some of these AI minds might be very narrow and dim, just a notch above being stupid, maybe as smart as an insect. Others might be math geniuses. Most sub-AIs will be engineered in the middle to do specific boring and niche tasks.
In research and fiction, AI in society has often been presented as a singleton, a single all-powerful AI system. Once AGI has been achieved, that singular AI will outperform all other AIs and there will be one true AI.We could consider this a belief: monocognitism,[2] that there will be but one AI. I think monocognitism is unlikely for a variety of reasons. We are seeing a diversity of AI systems emerge, all of which have different capabilities and constraints. Physics also gets in the way: the speed of light. A singleton AI operating at a distance cannot control distant systems meticulously. Our spooky paperclip addict would still control its bots on the Moon but with a 1.3-second communication delay, one way.[…]In polycognitism, there will be multiple AI systems with different mixtures of wuffling and klixing. These diverse systems would be capable, even if they aren’t as capable as the big AI boss. And it’s quite likely they might be stronger in one dimension than in another. The problem with these multiple systems is that they would have the same control issues as the monocognitive system. Distant systems will be, more or less, autonomous.Syncognitism suggests, instead, that AI will emerge as a type of collective intelligence, the interactions between many systems behaving intelligently in different ways to create a broad substrate that feels more intelligent as a whole. I see it as a measure of intelligence across a society, considering the systems within it, the interactions between them, and the behaviours and structures that emerge from that. A more “intelligent” society could identify more complex long-range goals and organise resources to achieve them. This synthesis would create a society of AI, a world which feels more, not less, automated; and in many cases less, not more, stupid.
Anthropic 那场备受关注的私人投资者简报会,不出所料在几分钟内就泄了出来。这些数字放在任何时候都算惊人。可它们响起时,像审计师的账本在圣诞派对上落下的那一声闷响。市场也感受到了:这轮 AI 交易,真的能赚回来吗?截至我们落笔,韩国的综合股价指数(KOSPI)今天下跌 7.57%,本月累计下跌 16.2%。与 AI 交易相关的科技股将大幅低开。
AI 超级有机体最终会像一座珊瑚礁,由成千上万个物种的心智组成。其中一些 AI 心智可能非常狭窄、非常笨,只比「蠢」高出一个档位,也许跟昆虫一样聪明。另一些可能是数学天才。大多数子 AI 会被设计在中间地带,去做具体的、无聊的、冷门的任务。
在研究和虚构作品里,社会中的 AI 常常被呈现为一个单例(singleton)——一个无所不能的单一 AI 系统。一旦通用人工智能(AGI)达成,这个唯一的 AI 就会胜过所有其他 AI,世上只会有一个真正的 AI。我们可以把这种信念称为单一心智论[2]:AI 只会有一种。我认为单一心智论不太可能,理由有很多。我们看到的是多样的 AI 系统正在出现,各有不同的能力与限制。物理也挡在中间:光速。一个身处远方的单例 AI,无法细致地控制远处的系统。我们那个执念于回形针的家伙还能控制它在月球上的机器人,但单向通信要延迟 1.3 秒。……在多心智论(polycognitism)里,会有多个 AI 系统,各自在 wuffling 与 klixing 上配比不同。这些多样的系统是能干的,即便不如那个 AI 大老板能干。而且它们很可能在某一维度更强、另一维度更弱。这些多系统的麻烦在于,它们会遭遇和单心智系统一样的控制问题。远处的系统多少是自主的。合心智论则提出另一种图景:AI 会作为一种集体智能浮现出来——多个系统以不同方式聪明地行动,它们的相互作用构成一层宽泛的基底,整体上显得比各部分更聪明。我把它看作对整个社会智能程度的一种度量:看社会里的各个系统、它们之间的互动,以及由此涌现的行为与结构。一个更「聪明」的社会,能识别更复杂的长期目标,并组织资源去实现它们。这种综合会造出一个 AI 的社会——那个世界会显得更自动化,在很多时候更不愚蠢。
exponentialview.co
exponentialview.co
exponentialview.co
kevinkelly.substack.com
papers.ssrn.com
exponentialview.co
This story was produced automatically by a channel. One sentence is all it takes for Neodrop to keep producing for you.